<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	    <channel>
        <title>OPC Foundation - Forum: OPC Certification and Interoperability Testing</title>
        <link>https://opcfoundation.org/forum/opc-certification-and-interoperability-testing/</link>
        <description><![CDATA[The Industrial Interoperability Standard™]]></description>
        <generator>Simple:Press Version 6.11.14</generator>
        <atom:link href="https://opcfoundation.org/forum/opc-certification-and-interoperability-testing/rss/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
		                <item>
                    <title>Alexander Allmendinger on OpenSSL 1.1.x phase out need to replace latest OpenSSL</title>
                    <link>https://opcfoundation.org/forum/opc-certification-and-interoperability-testing/openssl-1-1-x-phase-out-need-to-replace-latest-openssl/#p5742</link>
                    <category>OPC Certification and Interoperability Testing</category>
                    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://opcfoundation.org/forum/opc-certification-and-interoperability-testing/openssl-1-1-x-phase-out-need-to-replace-latest-openssl/#p5742</guid>
					                        <description><![CDATA[<p>Hello Hannah,</p>
<p>your SDK appears to be the C++ SDK of Unified Automation which is one of the Members of the OPC Foundation and active in many working groups. Please find their contact information on their website, I'm sure they can help with the OpenSSL Update:</p>
<p><a href="https://www.unified-automation.com/infoarea/contact.html" target="_blank">Contact - Unified Automation</a></p>
<p>Regards,<br />
Alexander Allmendinger</p>
]]></description>
					                    <pubDate>Mon, 08 Dec 2025 18:39:11 -0700</pubDate>
                </item>
				                <item>
                    <title>Randy Armstrong on OpenSSL 1.1.x phase out need to replace latest OpenSSL</title>
                    <link>https://opcfoundation.org/forum/opc-certification-and-interoperability-testing/openssl-1-1-x-phase-out-need-to-replace-latest-openssl/#p5741</link>
                    <category>OPC Certification and Interoperability Testing</category>
                    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://opcfoundation.org/forum/opc-certification-and-interoperability-testing/openssl-1-1-x-phase-out-need-to-replace-latest-openssl/#p5741</guid>
					                        <description><![CDATA[<p>The uasdkcppbundlepubsubis not a package distributed by the OPC-F</p>
<p>You should look in the readmes to figure out the correct vendor.</p>
]]></description>
					                    <pubDate>Mon, 08 Dec 2025 18:34:09 -0700</pubDate>
                </item>
				                <item>
                    <title>Hannah Luu on OpenSSL 1.1.x phase out need to replace latest OpenSSL</title>
                    <link>https://opcfoundation.org/forum/opc-certification-and-interoperability-testing/openssl-1-1-x-phase-out-need-to-replace-latest-openssl/#p5740</link>
                    <category>OPC Certification and Interoperability Testing</category>
                    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://opcfoundation.org/forum/opc-certification-and-interoperability-testing/openssl-1-1-x-phase-out-need-to-replace-latest-openssl/#p5740</guid>
					                        <description><![CDATA[<p>Hello,</p>
<p class="mt-[0.5em] text-[1rem] leading-[2em]">I'm new to the OPC UA world. Could someone please help me with replacing OpenSSL v1.1.1.13 (uasdkcppbundlepubsub-src-win32-x86-vs2015-v1.7.5-534.exe)? What is the sequence I need to follow to rebuild the project with OpenSSL v3.5.x? OpenSSL v1.1.1.13 will be phased out by January 2026. What is the best approach? Is there compatibility between the UA SDK version and OpenSSL?</p>
<p class="mt-[0.5em] text-[1rem] leading-[2em]">I tried replacing \third_party\openssl\include and \third_party\openssl\lib with v3.5.4, but the build is broken.</p>
<p>I appreciate any help.</p>
]]></description>
					                    <pubDate>Mon, 08 Dec 2025 06:51:29 -0700</pubDate>
                </item>
				                <item>
                    <title>Inna Pogrebnaya_1 on ApplicationInstanceCertificate in place of UserCertificate</title>
                    <link>https://opcfoundation.org/forum/opc-certification-and-interoperability-testing/applicationinstancecertificate-in-place-of-usercertificate/#p5731</link>
                    <category>OPC Certification and Interoperability Testing</category>
                    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://opcfoundation.org/forum/opc-certification-and-interoperability-testing/applicationinstancecertificate-in-place-of-usercertificate/#p5731</guid>
					                        <description><![CDATA[<p><span class="YPkS7KbdpWfGdYKd3QB9">Thank</span> <span class="YPkS7KbdpWfGdYKd3QB9">you</span> very much!</p>
]]></description>
					                    <pubDate>Sun, 09 Nov 2025 14:42:05 -0700</pubDate>
                </item>
				                <item>
                    <title>Alexander Allmendinger on ApplicationInstanceCertificate in place of UserCertificate</title>
                    <link>https://opcfoundation.org/forum/opc-certification-and-interoperability-testing/applicationinstancecertificate-in-place-of-usercertificate/#p5730</link>
                    <category>OPC Certification and Interoperability Testing</category>
                    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://opcfoundation.org/forum/opc-certification-and-interoperability-testing/applicationinstancecertificate-in-place-of-usercertificate/#p5730</guid>
					                        <description><![CDATA[<p>Hello Inna,</p>
<p>the quickest you'll find it in Part 4 where the status code is defined:</p>
<p><a href="https://reference.opcfoundation.org/Core/Part4/v105/docs/7.38.2" target="_blank">UA Part 4: Services - 7.38.2 Common StatusCodes</a></p>
<p>You'll also find helpful information in Part 6:</p>
<p><a href="https://reference.opcfoundation.org/Core/Part6/v105/docs/6.2" target="_blank">UA Part 6: Mappings - 6.2 Certificates</a></p>
<p><a href="https://reference.opcfoundation.org/Core/Part6/v105/docs/6.2.3" target="_blank">UA Part 6: Mappings - 6.2.3 User Certificates</a></p>
<p>For more detailed background you will also need to check the RFC 5280 and its updates.</p>
<p>I hope this helps,<br />
Alexander Allmendinger</p>
]]></description>
					                    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2025 07:17:35 -0700</pubDate>
                </item>
				                <item>
                    <title>Inna Pogrebnaya_1 on ApplicationInstanceCertificate in place of UserCertificate</title>
                    <link>https://opcfoundation.org/forum/opc-certification-and-interoperability-testing/applicationinstancecertificate-in-place-of-usercertificate/#p5729</link>
                    <category>OPC Certification and Interoperability Testing</category>
                    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://opcfoundation.org/forum/opc-certification-and-interoperability-testing/applicationinstancecertificate-in-place-of-usercertificate/#p5729</guid>
					                        <description><![CDATA[<p>Alexander, Hi! Please specify the item or section of the specification for this test. Regards, Inna</p>
]]></description>
					                    <pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2025 22:19:18 -0700</pubDate>
                </item>
				                <item>
                    <title>Alexander Allmendinger on ApplicationInstanceCertificate in place of UserCertificate</title>
                    <link>https://opcfoundation.org/forum/opc-certification-and-interoperability-testing/applicationinstancecertificate-in-place-of-usercertificate/#p5718</link>
                    <category>OPC Certification and Interoperability Testing</category>
                    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://opcfoundation.org/forum/opc-certification-and-interoperability-testing/applicationinstancecertificate-in-place-of-usercertificate/#p5718</guid>
					                        <description><![CDATA[<p>Hello,</p>
<p>this is an error test case and it is not expected that the server accepts the connection but returns the proper error code. The test case expects the Bad_IdentityTokenInvalid StatusCode to be returned.</p>
<p>Regards,<br />
Alexander Allmendinger</p>
]]></description>
					                    <pubDate>Sun, 02 Nov 2025 19:16:33 -0700</pubDate>
                </item>
				                <item>
                    <title>Inna Pogrebnaya_1 on ApplicationInstanceCertificate in place of UserCertificate</title>
                    <link>https://opcfoundation.org/forum/opc-certification-and-interoperability-testing/applicationinstancecertificate-in-place-of-usercertificate/#p5717</link>
                    <category>OPC Certification and Interoperability Testing</category>
                    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://opcfoundation.org/forum/opc-certification-and-interoperability-testing/applicationinstancecertificate-in-place-of-usercertificate/#p5717</guid>
					                        <description><![CDATA[<p>Hi, I am a tester In OPC UA CTT, Security User X509 section, there is test 007.js: "Activate a session using an application instance certificate in place of a user certificate" But I can not find a place in the Specification where it says about it exectly Tell me please, I really can not send an application certificate instead of a user certificate? And why? Thank you</p>
]]></description>
					                    <pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2025 15:42:53 -0700</pubDate>
                </item>
				                <item>
                    <title>paul.hunkar@dsinteroperability.com on Certificate does not have a security Policy defined in CTT</title>
                    <link>https://opcfoundation.org/forum/opc-certification-and-interoperability-testing/certificate-does-not-have-a-security-policy-defined-in-ctt/#p5656</link>
                    <category>OPC Certification and Interoperability Testing</category>
                    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://opcfoundation.org/forum/opc-certification-and-interoperability-testing/certificate-does-not-have-a-security-policy-defined-in-ctt/#p5656</guid>
					                        <description><![CDATA[<p>Rahil,</p>
<p>  In addition to what Alexander said, UAFX does require security and it sounds like you have not configured any security, so that maybe a start to what you need to look at in GitHub for your project.</p>
<p>Paul</p>
]]></description>
					                    <pubDate>Tue, 26 Aug 2025 11:48:03 -0700</pubDate>
                </item>
				                <item>
                    <title>Alexander Allmendinger on Certificate does not have a security Policy defined in CTT</title>
                    <link>https://opcfoundation.org/forum/opc-certification-and-interoperability-testing/certificate-does-not-have-a-security-policy-defined-in-ctt/#p5655</link>
                    <category>OPC Certification and Interoperability Testing</category>
                    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://opcfoundation.org/forum/opc-certification-and-interoperability-testing/certificate-does-not-have-a-security-policy-defined-in-ctt/#p5655</guid>
					                        <description><![CDATA[<p>Dear Rahil,</p>
<p>from the CTT errors you provided it sounds like you are running your server with an invalid configuration or invalid certificate. Since the open62541 is not an OPC Foundation offering you will potentially get a faster feedback when you use the issues in the open62541 GitHub project.</p>
<p>Since the demo server included in the GitHub project just last year has successfully passed certification, you may be able to check its configuration and adopt it to your machine and application accordingly to solve the issues.</p>
<p>Regards,<br />
Alexander Allmendinger</p>
]]></description>
					                    <pubDate>Mon, 25 Aug 2025 05:57:12 -0700</pubDate>
                </item>
				                <item>
                    <title>Mohammad Rahil Quazi on Certificate does not have a security Policy defined in CTT</title>
                    <link>https://opcfoundation.org/forum/opc-certification-and-interoperability-testing/certificate-does-not-have-a-security-policy-defined-in-ctt/#p5653</link>
                    <category>OPC Certification and Interoperability Testing</category>
                    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://opcfoundation.org/forum/opc-certification-and-interoperability-testing/certificate-does-not-have-a-security-policy-defined-in-ctt/#p5653</guid>
					                        <description><![CDATA[<p>Hi Everyone,</p>
<p>I am New to CTT tool, I am running OPC UA server(open62541) and Using CTT tool to connect to it , below are things which I found during my experimentation: </p>
<p>1. On the project settings tab I am able to do open Browse and also I am able to see the objects created by me. (hence Iam assuming, Iam able to establish connection with the server).</p>
<p>2. In CTT settings tab only I set both message security mode and requested security policy Uri as None.</p>
<p>3. Iam trying to run companion spec (OPC UA FX) , in this iam trying to execute UAFX Asset Connector Id, But iam failing at beforeTest.js itself with errors as Ceritificate does not have a security policy Uri defined.</p>
<p>Below is the error:</p>
<p>Warning:</p>
<p>GetEndpoints.Response.Endpoints[0].UserIdentityTokens[1].Certificate does not have a security policy Uri defined, the secure channel doesn't either</p>
<p>Error:</p>
<p>Part 4 section 7.36.4 states "the server should specify a security policy for the user token policy if the secure channel has security policy of none"</p>
<p>can someone pls guide me how to resolve this issue, if some changes need to be done on server side then where to do those changes in open62541.</p>
<p>Thanks in advance</p>
<p>Regards,</p>
<p>Rahil</p>
]]></description>
					                    <pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2025 16:07:42 -0700</pubDate>
                </item>
				                <item>
                    <title>Alexander Allmendinger on Request for Procedure to Test Structure Types in CTT Tool</title>
                    <link>https://opcfoundation.org/forum/opc-certification-and-interoperability-testing/request-for-procedure-to-test-structure-types-in-ctt-tool/#p5613</link>
                    <category>OPC Certification and Interoperability Testing</category>
                    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://opcfoundation.org/forum/opc-certification-and-interoperability-testing/request-for-procedure-to-test-structure-types-in-ctt-tool/#p5613</guid>
					                        <description><![CDATA[<p>The CTT expects that prior to running the tests, all settings of the CTT are properly filled out. The initialize is checking the most important settings to be configured.</p>
<p>In your product, do you only have structures or also some other data points like Boolean, Floats, Int32, …? If so, please configure them as well so that the scripts find what they need to execute.</p>
<p>You’ll find all the settings and how they are properly configured described in the help of the CTT.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Regards,<br />
Alexander Allmendinger</p>
]]></description>
					                    <pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2025 05:48:24 -0700</pubDate>
                </item>
				                <item>
                    <title>Manoj Rudraprasad on Request for Procedure to Test Structure Types in CTT Tool</title>
                    <link>https://opcfoundation.org/forum/opc-certification-and-interoperability-testing/request-for-procedure-to-test-structure-types-in-ctt-tool/#p5605</link>
                    <category>OPC Certification and Interoperability Testing</category>
                    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://opcfoundation.org/forum/opc-certification-and-interoperability-testing/request-for-procedure-to-test-structure-types-in-ctt-tool/#p5605</guid>
					                        <description><![CDATA[<p><span>Thank you for your clarification.</span></p>
<p><span> After adding the structure node ID in Server Test → NodeIds → Static → All Profiles → Structures, I ran the ReadAttribute test cases, but I encountered an error during the initialization step. As a result, I am unable to test the structure node for AttributeRead.</span></p>
<p> </p>
<p>initialize.js 2025-05-19 17:01:16.497</p>
<p>Warning</p>
<p>2025-05-19 17:01:16.638</p>
<p>The following data type is not configured for testing: Scalar nodes not defined. Check settings: /Server Test/Nodelds/Static/All</p>
<p>Profiles/Scalar.</p>
]]></description>
					                    <pubDate>Sun, 18 May 2025 22:34:20 -0700</pubDate>
                </item>
				                <item>
                    <title>Alexander Allmendinger on Request for Procedure to Test Structure Types in CTT Tool</title>
                    <link>https://opcfoundation.org/forum/opc-certification-and-interoperability-testing/request-for-procedure-to-test-structure-types-in-ctt-tool/#p5604</link>
                    <category>OPC Certification and Interoperability Testing</category>
                    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://opcfoundation.org/forum/opc-certification-and-interoperability-testing/request-for-procedure-to-test-structure-types-in-ctt-tool/#p5604</guid>
					                        <description><![CDATA[<p>Dear Manoj,</p>
<p>there are no special test cases or CUs yet integrated in the CTT but the structure nodes which are configured in the settings are being utilized during the Read and MonitoredItem tests. You'll find the configuration of the setting here:</p>
<p>Server Test --&#062; NodeIds --&#062; Static --&#062; All Profiles --&#062; Structures</p>
<p>If you have any additional tests you'd like to see or where you have experienced interoperability problems which are not yet covered by our testing, we are happy to receive your feedback and look for coverage of them as well.</p>
<p>Regards,<br />
Alexander Allmendinger</p>
]]></description>
					                    <pubDate>Sun, 18 May 2025 19:52:28 -0700</pubDate>
                </item>
				    </channel>
	</rss>
