<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	    <channel>
        <title>OPC Foundation - Forum: OPC UA Standard</title>
        <link>https://opcfoundation.org/forum/opc-ua-standard/</link>
        <description><![CDATA[The Industrial Interoperability Standard™]]></description>
        <generator>Simple:Press Version 6.11.14</generator>
        <atom:link href="https://opcfoundation.org/forum/opc-ua-standard/rss/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
		                <item>
                    <title>Randy Armstrong on Is it allowed to set the value to null on a mandatory property in an EventType?</title>
                    <link>https://opcfoundation.org/forum/opc-ua-standard/is-it-allowed-to-set-the-value-to-null-on-a-mandatory-property-in-an-eventtype/#p5827</link>
                    <category>OPC UA Standard</category>
                    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://opcfoundation.org/forum/opc-ua-standard/is-it-allowed-to-set-the-value-to-null-on-a-mandatory-property-in-an-eventtype/#p5827</guid>
					                        <description><![CDATA[<p>If a mandatory field has a nullable value you could set it to. i..e String to ""</p>
<p>But the Value cannot be Variant.Empty for mandatory properties.</p>
<p>However, the "" rule does not apply if the description of the property makes it clear that "" is not a valid value:</p>
<p><em>SourceName</em> provides a description of the source of the <em>Event</em>. This could be the string-part of the <em>DisplayName</em> of the <em>Event</em> source using the default locale of the server, if the <em>Event</em> is specific to a <em>Node,</em> or some server-specific notation.</p>
<p>(i.e. "" is not a description)</p>
<p>Clients should be designed defensively to deal with misbehaving Servers but that does not make the server right.</p>
]]></description>
					                    <pubDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2026 12:36:59 -0700</pubDate>
                </item>
				                <item>
                    <title>mikael.l.eklund@se.abb.com on Is it allowed to set the value to null on a mandatory property in an EventType?</title>
                    <link>https://opcfoundation.org/forum/opc-ua-standard/is-it-allowed-to-set-the-value-to-null-on-a-mandatory-property-in-an-eventtype/#p5826</link>
                    <category>OPC UA Standard</category>
                    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://opcfoundation.org/forum/opc-ua-standard/is-it-allowed-to-set-the-value-to-null-on-a-mandatory-property-in-an-eventtype/#p5826</guid>
					                        <description><![CDATA[<p>Hi,</p>
<p>Is it allowed, according to the specifications, to set the value on a mandatory property, in an event, to null. </p>
<p> </p>
<p>For example:</p>
<p>Assuming an event of EventType BaseEventType.</p>
<p>Is it allowed for an OPC UA server to set, for example, property SourceName to null in the event?</p>
<p> </p>
<p>If it is, is it the same for any mandatory property in any EventType? </p>
<p>Should an OPC UA client be able to take that into account?</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Thanks</p>
]]></description>
					                    <pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2026 18:07:25 -0700</pubDate>
                </item>
				                <item>
                    <title>Thomas Schulz_2 on Figure B.8 missing in OPC 10000-3</title>
                    <link>https://opcfoundation.org/forum/opc-ua-standard/figure-b-8-missing-in-opc-10000-3/#p5825</link>
                    <category>OPC UA Standard</category>
                    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://opcfoundation.org/forum/opc-ua-standard/figure-b-8-missing-in-opc-10000-3/#p5825</guid>
					                        <description><![CDATA[<p>see <a href="https://mantis.opcfoundation.org/view.php?id=11302" rel="nofollow" target="_blank"><a href="https://mantis.opcfoundation.o" rel="nofollow">https://mantis.opcfoundation.o</a>.....p?id=11302</a></p>
]]></description>
					                    <pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2026 20:49:02 -0700</pubDate>
                </item>
				                <item>
                    <title>Thomas Schulz_2 on Intro sentence of 9.1 General; OPC 10000-3; OPC Unified Architecture Part 3 :Address Space Model; Release 1.05.06; 2025-10-22</title>
                    <link>https://opcfoundation.org/forum/opc-ua-standard/intro-sentence-of-9-1-general-opc-10000-3-opc-unified-architecture-part-3-address-space-model-release-1-05-06-2025-10-22/#p5824</link>
                    <category>OPC UA Standard</category>
                    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://opcfoundation.org/forum/opc-ua-standard/intro-sentence-of-9-1-general-opc-10000-3-opc-unified-architecture-part-3-address-space-model-release-1-05-06-2025-10-22/#p5824</guid>
					                        <description><![CDATA[<p>see <a href="https://mantis.opcfoundation.org/view.php?id=11301" rel="nofollow" target="_blank"><a href="https://mantis.opcfoundation.o" rel="nofollow">https://mantis.opcfoundation.o</a>.....p?id=11301</a></p>
]]></description>
					                    <pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2026 20:43:36 -0700</pubDate>
                </item>
				                <item>
                    <title>Randy Armstrong on Intro sentence of 9.1 General; OPC 10000-3; OPC Unified Architecture Part 3 :Address Space Model; Release 1.05.06; 2025-10-22</title>
                    <link>https://opcfoundation.org/forum/opc-ua-standard/intro-sentence-of-9-1-general-opc-10000-3-opc-unified-architecture-part-3-address-space-model-release-1-05-06-2025-10-22/#p5823</link>
                    <category>OPC UA Standard</category>
                    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://opcfoundation.org/forum/opc-ua-standard/intro-sentence-of-9-1-general-opc-10000-3-opc-unified-architecture-part-3-address-space-model-release-1-05-06-2025-10-22/#p5823</guid>
					                        <description><![CDATA[<p>Please enter mantis issue:</p>
<p><a href="https://mantis.opcfoundation.org/set_project.php?project_id=31&amp;make_default=no" rel="nofollow" target="_blank"><a href="https://mantis.opcfoundation.o" rel="nofollow">https://mantis.opcfoundation.o</a>.....default=no</a></p>
]]></description>
					                    <pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2026 19:04:17 -0700</pubDate>
                </item>
				                <item>
                    <title>Randy Armstrong on Figure B.8 missing in OPC 10000-3</title>
                    <link>https://opcfoundation.org/forum/opc-ua-standard/figure-b-8-missing-in-opc-10000-3/#p5822</link>
                    <category>OPC UA Standard</category>
                    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://opcfoundation.org/forum/opc-ua-standard/figure-b-8-missing-in-opc-10000-3/#p5822</guid>
					                        <description><![CDATA[<p>Please create mantis issues:</p>
<p><a href="https://mantis.opcfoundation.org/set_project.php?project_id=31&amp;make_default=no" rel="nofollow" target="_blank"><a href="https://mantis.opcfoundation.o" rel="nofollow">https://mantis.opcfoundation.o</a>.....default=no</a></p>
]]></description>
					                    <pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2026 19:02:26 -0700</pubDate>
                </item>
				                <item>
                    <title>Thomas Schulz_2 on Intro sentence of 9.1 General; OPC 10000-3; OPC Unified Architecture Part 3 :Address Space Model; Release 1.05.06; 2025-10-22</title>
                    <link>https://opcfoundation.org/forum/opc-ua-standard/intro-sentence-of-9-1-general-opc-10000-3-opc-unified-architecture-part-3-address-space-model-release-1-05-06-2025-10-22/#p5821</link>
                    <category>OPC UA Standard</category>
                    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://opcfoundation.org/forum/opc-ua-standard/intro-sentence-of-9-1-general-opc-10000-3-opc-unified-architecture-part-3-address-space-model-release-1-05-06-2025-10-22/#p5821</guid>
					                        <description><![CDATA[<p>Hello!</p>
<p>Section 9.1 General of OPC 10000-3; OPC Unified Architecture Part 3 :Address Space Model; Release 1.05.06; 2025-10-22 starts with "The remainder of <strong>8.61</strong> defines EventTypes." Section 8.61 is about CurrentyUnitType.</p>
<p>See also section 4.1, first paragraph, last sentence: "Standard <em>ReferenceTypes</em>, <em>DataTypes</em> and <em>EventTypes</em> are defined in Clauses 7 to <strong>8.61</strong>."</p>
<p>As well section 4.7.2 EventTypes, last paragraph, first sentence: "Standard <em>EventTypes </em>are described in Clause <strong>8.61</strong>."</p>
<p>There seem to be a typo, an incorrect or undefined reference.</p>
<p>Thanks and regards</p>
]]></description>
					                    <pubDate>Sun, 09 Aug 2026 18:03:55 -0700</pubDate>
                </item>
				                <item>
                    <title>Thomas Schulz_2 on Figure B.8 missing in OPC 10000-3</title>
                    <link>https://opcfoundation.org/forum/opc-ua-standard/figure-b-8-missing-in-opc-10000-3/#p5820</link>
                    <category>OPC UA Standard</category>
                    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://opcfoundation.org/forum/opc-ua-standard/figure-b-8-missing-in-opc-10000-3/#p5820</guid>
					                        <description><![CDATA[<p>Hello!</p>
<p>I'm working through the spec, currently OPC 10000-3; OPC Unified Architecture Part 3 :Address Space Model; Release 1.05.06; 2025-10-22.</p>
<p>Annex B, section B 3.4 Object and ObjectType is short with the follwoing text: "Objects and ObjectTypes are shown in Figure B.8."</p>
<p>The description of the figure is given, but the figure itself is missing.</p>
<p>At least the necessary information is shown in figure B.7. Figure B.7 is a bit cluttered and makes it hard to make out specific details.</p>
<p>Best regards</p>
]]></description>
					                    <pubDate>Sun, 09 Aug 2026 17:27:13 -0700</pubDate>
                </item>
				                <item>
                    <title>Randy Armstrong on Need Guidance on PublishRequest TimeoutHint</title>
                    <link>https://opcfoundation.org/forum/opc-ua-standard/need-guidance-on-publishrequest-timeouthint/#p5800</link>
                    <category>OPC UA Standard</category>
                    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://opcfoundation.org/forum/opc-ua-standard/need-guidance-on-publishrequest-timeouthint/#p5800</guid>
					                        <description><![CDATA[<p>First PublishingInterval should not be that long.<br />
If you don't need frequent samples then set the SamplingInterval on MonitoredItems.</p>
<p>Second, use the KeepAliveInterval to keep your Publish requests fresh.</p>
<p>i.e. use 10 mins TimeoutHint but a 5 min PublishingInterval and KeepAliveCount = 1.</p>
<p>This ensures a PublishRequest is consumed long before it times out.</p>
<p>You would only get actually data in a response when the SamplingInterval expires (10,000 ms, 15,000 ms or 86, 400, 000 ms)</p>
]]></description>
					                    <pubDate>Sun, 21 Jun 2026 00:06:20 -0700</pubDate>
                </item>
				                <item>
                    <title>ross.turton@matrikonopc.com on Need Guidance on PublishRequest TimeoutHint</title>
                    <link>https://opcfoundation.org/forum/opc-ua-standard/need-guidance-on-publishrequest-timeouthint/#p5798</link>
                    <category>OPC UA Standard</category>
                    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://opcfoundation.org/forum/opc-ua-standard/need-guidance-on-publishrequest-timeouthint/#p5798</guid>
					                        <description><![CDATA[<p>The UA Spec indicates that the TimeoutHint from the UA Client is a suggestion to the UA Server.  The UA Server should use the timeouthint provided by the client as the minimum timeout.  </p>
<p>Given that PublishRequests are using for multiple subscriptions, say you have the following 3 subscriptions:</p>
<p>10,000 ms  Publishing Interval</p>
<p>15,000 ms Publishing Interval</p>
<p>86, 400, 000 ms (24 Hour) Publishing Interval</p>
<p> </p>
<p>What would be the recommended Timeout Hint to use for Publishing Intervals given that if I use something greater than 24 Hours it will take 24+ hours for the requests to timeout for the faster publishing intervals?</p>
<p>This would cause excessive delays to users in knowing that the requests for faster publishing intervals have timed out.</p>
]]></description>
					                    <pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2026 01:44:27 -0700</pubDate>
                </item>
				                <item>
                    <title>Randy Armstrong on QuantitiesFolderType and UserCredentialCertificateType removed from standard</title>
                    <link>https://opcfoundation.org/forum/opc-ua-standard/quantitiesfoldertype-and-usercredentialcertificatetype-removed-from-standard/#p5794</link>
                    <category>OPC UA Standard</category>
                    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://opcfoundation.org/forum/opc-ua-standard/quantitiesfoldertype-and-usercredentialcertificatetype-removed-from-standard/#p5794</guid>
					                        <description><![CDATA[<p>It will be part of 1.05.08. You shoudl be able to cut and paste the types into the NodeSets that you use in meantime.</p>
]]></description>
					                    <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2026 12:33:27 -0700</pubDate>
                </item>
				                <item>
                    <title>mattias.haggkvist@se.abb.com on QuantitiesFolderType and UserCredentialCertificateType removed from standard</title>
                    <link>https://opcfoundation.org/forum/opc-ua-standard/quantitiesfoldertype-and-usercredentialcertificatetype-removed-from-standard/#p5793</link>
                    <category>OPC UA Standard</category>
                    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://opcfoundation.org/forum/opc-ua-standard/quantitiesfoldertype-and-usercredentialcertificatetype-removed-from-standard/#p5793</guid>
					                        <description><![CDATA[<p>Hi, I can see in the Mantis issues that the removed types will be reentered as deprecated in the UA Standard Nodeset.Is there a plan (rough estimate) when the next (1.05.08?) UA Standard Nodeset will be released?</p>
]]></description>
					                    <pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2026 00:08:13 -0700</pubDate>
                </item>
				                <item>
                    <title>Randy Armstrong on Confusion about error codes</title>
                    <link>https://opcfoundation.org/forum/opc-ua-standard/confusion-about-error-codes/#p5792</link>
                    <category>OPC UA Standard</category>
                    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://opcfoundation.org/forum/opc-ua-standard/confusion-about-error-codes/#p5792</guid>
					                        <description><![CDATA[<p>Any limit specified in the information model exposed by the server has to be enforced by the server.</p>
<p>However, some limits may be enforced by the stack.</p>
<p>For example, a Variable may have MaxStringLength of 2GB but the server configuration limits array lengths to 1MB so a request with a 2GB string would be blocked before its gets out of the stack.</p>
<p>You can assume SDKs enforce communication level limits but the Server application will likely need to enforce limits on individual values.</p>
]]></description>
					                    <pubDate>Mon, 25 May 2026 03:42:27 -0700</pubDate>
                </item>
				                <item>
                    <title>Patrick Berger on Confusion about error codes</title>
                    <link>https://opcfoundation.org/forum/opc-ua-standard/confusion-about-error-codes/#p5791</link>
                    <category>OPC UA Standard</category>
                    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://opcfoundation.org/forum/opc-ua-standard/confusion-about-error-codes/#p5791</guid>
					                        <description><![CDATA[<p>One more question related to range checks and errors: Who is responsible for check defined limitations? For example <a href="https://reference.opcfoundation.org/specs/OPC-10000-6/f-13" rel="nofollow" target="_blank"><a href="https://reference.opcfoundatio" rel="nofollow">https://reference.opcfoundatio</a>.....000-6/f-13</a> defines MaxStringLength and Array-Dimensions for structure fields within the NodeSet. Interestingly, no companion specification define these values or provide guidelines.</p>
<p>Does the stack/sdk check this ranges or does each application have to do it on its own? For example if a client calls a method with a structure as parameter and MaxStringLength exceeds the defined limit in the NodeSet. Where does this check happens</p>
<p>- the client application before calling the method</p>
<p>- the client SDK</p>
<p>- the server SDK</p>
<p>- the server application after receiving the data and loaded it into the RAM, but before processing it</p>
<p> </p>
<p>I'd be surprised if the SDKs didn't check this, because the information is standardized in the NodeSets and can serve as the first line of defense against resource constraints or DOM attacks.</p>
]]></description>
					                    <pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2026 15:45:50 -0700</pubDate>
                </item>
				                <item>
                    <title>Randy Armstrong on Facing issue  of disconnect after 57 minutes in OPCUA server  built on Dot net , using OPCUACore.dll version 1.5.374.158</title>
                    <link>https://opcfoundation.org/forum/opc-ua-standard/facing-issue-of-disconnect-after-57-minutes-in-opcua-server-built-on-dot-net-using-opcuacore-dll-version-1-5-374-158/#p5789</link>
                    <category>OPC UA Standard</category>
                    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://opcfoundation.org/forum/opc-ua-standard/facing-issue-of-disconnect-after-57-minutes-in-opcua-server-built-on-dot-net-using-opcuacore-dll-version-1-5-374-158/#p5789</guid>
					                        <description><![CDATA[<p>These questions are best handled on GitHub: <a href="https://github.com/OPCFoundation/UA-.NETStandard/issues" rel="nofollow" target="_blank"><a href="https://github.com/OPCFoundati" rel="nofollow">https://github.com/OPCFoundati</a>.....ard/issues</a></p>
]]></description>
					                    <pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2026 08:37:42 -0700</pubDate>
                </item>
				    </channel>
	</rss>
