Can we use Standard Server class file for Embedded 2017 UA Server profile?|OPC UA Implementation: Stacks, Tools, and Samples|Forum|OPC Foundation

Avatar
Search
Forum Scope


Match



Forum Options



Minimum search word length is 3 characters - maximum search word length is 84 characters
Lost password?
sp_Feed sp_PrintTopic sp_TopicIcon
Can we use Standard Server class file for Embedded 2017 UA Server profile?
Avatar
Prasad Sutar
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 7
Member Since:
03/11/2021
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
1
04/29/2022 - 07:08
sp_Permalink sp_Print

Hi,

We are developing a product of OPC UA Server using the foundation stack. We have inherited the Standard Server [ Opc.Ua.Server dll ] class file for our project. If we are going for certification with Embedded 2017 UA Server profile instead of Standard 2017 UA Server , can we use the same Standard Server class file for our project  or will it change for Embedded 2017 UA Server profile?

Thank You,

Prasad.PS.

Avatar
Randy Armstrong
Admin
Forum Posts: 1580
Member Since:
05/30/2017
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
2
05/01/2022 - 02:11
sp_Permalink sp_Print

The embedded profile is for embedded systems.

Are you using .NET Core on an embedded system or are you just trying to reduce your development effort?

Avatar
Prasad Sutar
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 7
Member Since:
03/11/2021
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
3
05/01/2022 - 22:30
sp_Permalink sp_Print

Hi,

Our application is designed to be running on a PC based system, and  has nothing to do with Embedded systems. We are just trying to reduce the development effort.

So can we still use Standard Server class file for our application. And choose the Embedded 2017 UA Server for certification? 

Thank You,

Prasad.PS.

Avatar
Randy Armstrong
Admin
Forum Posts: 1580
Member Since:
05/30/2017
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
4
05/02/2022 - 14:27
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_EditHistory

When I investigated why you would be making such as strange request I discovered there are issues with sample Server library that need to be fixed.

The right way to deal with this issue it to work with the community to fix the shared codebase. And yes, in the short term, that could mean more work for you because you are in a position to help make and test these changes. However, in the long term, you will have a codebase that maintained by the community instead of a private branch with a bunch of hacks that you need to pass.

Ultimately, open source code only thrives when the community is willing to give something back.

Forum Timezone: America/Phoenix
Most Users Ever Online: 510
Currently Online:
Guest(s) 23
Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)
Top Posters:
Forum Stats:
Groups: 2
Forums: 10
Topics: 1446
Posts: 4891