Are these valid URIs according to datatype UriString( |OPC UA Standard|Forum|OPC Foundation

Forum Scope


Forum Options

Minimum search word length is 3 characters - maximum search word length is 84 characters
Lost password?
sp_Feed sp_PrintTopic sp_TopicIcon
Are these valid URIs according to datatype UriString(
Nisha Bhalke
New Member
Forum Posts: 2
Member Since:
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
11/20/2023 - 05:58
sp_Permalink sp_Print

Below are the uris I'm considering :



Please let me know if we should consider any other valid uris. 

Randy Armstrong
Forum Posts: 1501
Member Since:
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
11/20/2023 - 16:20
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_EditHistory

12.39 UriString says "Any string that conforms to URI as defined by RFC 3986"

URIs in UA are opaque strings that are compared using case sensitive string comparisons.

The comparison rules in RFC 3986 are not used.

1.05.03 adds the following discussion for URIs:

These URIs conform to RFC 3986, however, this specification is very open ended. This clause provides recommendations for constructing these URIs.

The recommendations help ensure that URIs are unique by providing a scope controlled by a single authority (e.g. the domain name) and are human readable. Programs shall always treat URIs as opaque strings that can only be tested for equality with a case sensitive string comparison. URIs should be tag URIs (RFC 4151) or HTTP URLs (RFC 3986). URLs should only be used if they link to actual webpages.

The scheme and domain name portions of the URI are in lower case. URIs may include query subcomponents and/or fragments.

Forum Timezone: America/Phoenix
Most Users Ever Online: 510
Currently Online:
Guest(s) 14
Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)
Top Posters:
Forum Stats:
Groups: 2
Forums: 10
Topics: 1384
Posts: 4688